We’ve just published the second in a series of reports on media favorability in the Connecticut Senate race. The race isn’t nearly as close as it was a couple of months ago, but come election day surprises are always plentiful! Even so, as a niche case study in media favorability on a major Senate race, we think it’s probably one of only a handful out there. We used our ImpactWatch(TM) web platform to generate this report — those interested can obtain access to a demo showing the nuts and bolts of the system here.
Key findings in our second Connecticut Senate race report covering the period from October 1, 2006 to November 5, 2006:
- Campaign Tactics, a category we created for articles about overall strategies employed by the candidates, particularly advertising strategies, was the most written about subject with 18% of all articles.
- The subject most written about in the last reporting period, the war in Iraq, was written about in 16% of the articles in this reporting period.
- Overall, coverage for both Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman was predominantly negative at 47 and 48% respectively.
- Local Connecticut publications favored Ned Lamont in the Campaign Tactics and Iraq War subject categories much moreso than national publications which tended to slightly favor Joe Lieberman.
- Poll results seem to directly affect the overall positive or negative media coverage of a particular candidate in a very significant manner.
To view the full report click here. We blogged about our previous report here.
The following graphs illustrate some of the trends in coverage available within the full report.
Lieberman Favorability Breakdown:
Lamont Favorability Breakdown:
Lamont vs. Liberman Average Favorability:
