<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ImpactWatch Blog by The Bivings Group &#187; Media Monitoring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.impactwatch.com/category/media-monitoring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.impactwatch.com</link>
	<description>Media Monitoring and Measurement Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:01:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tracking World Press Freedom Day 2011 #WPFD with Slurp140</title>
		<link>http://www.impactwatch.com/2011/tracking-world-press-freedom-day-2011-wpfd-with-slurp140/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactwatch.com/2011/tracking-world-press-freedom-day-2011-wpfd-with-slurp140/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 13:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Gray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slurp140]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#wpfd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNESCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Press Freedom Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactwatch.com/?p=1356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In addition to the great resources available on the United Nations Education Scientific and Culture Organization’s (UNESCO) website for World Press Freedom Day, we humbly submit our own Twitter tracking and analysis tool Slurp140: http://www.slurp140.com/wpfd/. Also be sure&#160; to check out the livestream going on right now!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to the <a href="http://wpfd2011.org/social-media" target="_blank">great resources available</a> on the United Nations Education Scientific and Culture Organization’s (UNESCO) website for <a href="http://wpfd2011.org/" target="_blank">World Press Freedom Day,</a> we humbly submit our own Twitter tracking and analysis tool Slurp140: <a href="http://www.slurp140.com/wpfd/">http://www.slurp140.com/wpfd/</a>. Also be sure&#160; to check out the <a href="http://wpfd2011.org/" target="_blank">livestream</a> going on right now!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slurp140.com/wpfd/"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/image.png" width="417" height="223" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactwatch.com/2011/tracking-world-press-freedom-day-2011-wpfd-with-slurp140/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Learning Summit, Tracking, and SLURP140</title>
		<link>http://www.impactwatch.com/2011/tracking_sls11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactwatch.com/2011/tracking_sls11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slurp140]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactwatch.com/?p=1328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weekend, several members of the Bivings Group client services team attended the Social Leaning Summit held at American University by the AU Social Media Club.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sls11.eventbrite.com/" target="_blank"><img class="alignright" title="AU SLS11" src="http://ausmcedu.org/resources/SLS11/SLS11_Logo400.png" alt="SLS!!" width="341" height="104" /></a>This weekend, several members of the Bivings Group client services team attended the <a href="http://sls11.eventbrite.com/" target="_blank">Social Leaning Summit</a> held at American University by the AU Social Media Club.  But we didn&#8217;t just <a href="http://www.bivingsreport.com/2011/2011-social-learning-summit/" target="_self">moderate panels</a> and network with attendees &#8211; we also create a <a href="http://www.slurp140.com/sls11" target="_blank">SLURP140</a> for this particular conference. This new and improve tracking tool helped over 300 attendees keep track (and compete with one another) when it came to twitter use during the conference.</p>
<p>Many American University students were tweeting up a storm using the ipad (1 and 2) while others were glued to the TweetDecks on their laptop screens. Overall, tweetdeck won as the most popular twitter service by a long shot. The #SLS11 hashtag was officially trending in Washington, DC by mid-afternoon on Saturday &#8211; thus bestowing the official social media stamp of approval on the student-run conference.</p>
<table style="height: 210px;" border="0" width="450">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<h3>Most Popular Twitter Users</h3>
</td>
<td>
<h3>Most Popular Clients</h3>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ul id="leaderboard">
<li> <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/JoshuaBauder">JoshuaBauder</a></strong>: 759 tweets</li>
<li> <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/AU_SMCEDU">AU_SMCEDU</a></strong>: 515 tweets</li>
<li> <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/ranachronism">ranachronism</a></strong>: 345 tweets</li>
<li> <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/Chronotope">Chronotope</a></strong>: 284 tweets</li>
<li> <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/bobfine">bobfine</a></strong>: 264 tweets</li>
<li> <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/TechChange">TechChange</a></strong>: 213 tweets</li>
<li> <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/harej">harej</a></strong>: 189 tweets</li>
<li> <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/DistrictOfAris">DistrictOfAris</a></strong>: 171 tweets</li>
<li> <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/chrisheuer">chrisheuer</a></strong>: 163 tweets</li>
<li> <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/mirandagale">mirandagale</a></strong>: 158 tweet</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>
<ul id="table-clients">
<li><strong><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.tweetdeck.com/">TweetDeck</a></strong>: 2763</li>
<li><strong><a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/">Twitter for iPhone</a></strong>: 1537</li>
<li><strong><a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/">web</a></strong>: 1421</li>
<li><strong><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.hootsuite.com/">HootSuite</a></strong>: 1118</li>
<li><strong><a rel="nofollow" href="http://itunes.apple.com/app/twitter/id333903271?mt=8">Twitter for iPad</a></strong>: 402</li>
<li><strong><a rel="nofollow" href="http://blackberry.com/twitter">Twitter for BlackBerry®</a></strong>: 318</li>
<li><strong><a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitterrific.com/">Twitterrific</a></strong>: 280</li>
<li><strong><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.echofon.com/">Echofon</a></strong>: 243</li>
<li><strong><a rel="nofollow" href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/twitter/id409789998?mt=12">Twitter for Mac</a></strong>: 136</li>
<li><strong><a rel="nofollow" href="http://ubersocial.com/">ÜberSocial</a></strong>: 120</li>
<li><strong>Other</strong>: 776 (50 clients)</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/iw_blog_sls11_2.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1329" title="Social learning summit graph" src="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/iw_blog_sls11_2-300x185.png" alt="Social learning summit graph" width="389" height="238" /></a></p>
<p>Big props go out to the <a href="http://ausmcedu.org/" target="_blank">AU Social Media Club</a> (<a href="http://twitter.com/AU_SMCEDU" target="_blank">@AU_SMCEDU</a>), specifically <a href="http://twitter.com/alexpriest" target="_blank">Alex</a> Priest- the founder and president of the AU club.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactwatch.com/2011/tracking_sls11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2011 Magazine Facebook Engagement Report</title>
		<link>http://www.impactwatch.com/2011/2011-magazine-facebook-engagement-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactwatch.com/2011/2011-magazine-facebook-engagement-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactwatch.com/?p=1305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Re-posted from the Bivings Report) In comparing the Facebook pages of the top 86 magazines by circulation, while those with the highest circulations generally had the highest number of Facebook fans, much like our newspaper study this presents a problem when trying to quantify engagement. In short, how do you avoid biasing your results towards [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Re-posted from <a href="http://www.bivingsreport.com/2011/top-ten-most-engaging-magazines-on-facebook/#more-3765" target="_blank">the Bivings Report)</a><img class="alignright" title="Bivings Top 10 Facebook Magazines" src="http://bivingsreport.com/images/Bivings_Report_Top_Ten_Facebook_Magazines_2-8-11.jpg" alt="infographic of " width="382" height="628" /></p>
<p>In comparing the Facebook pages of the top 86 magazines by circulation,  while those with the highest circulations generally had the highest  number of Facebook fans, much <a href="http://www.bivingsreport.com/2010/2010-best-us-newspaper-facebook-fan-pages/">like our newspaper study</a> this presents a problem when trying to quantify engagement. In short,  how do you avoid biasing your results towards magazines with a small,  but engaged numbers of Facebook fans.</p>
<p>For a magazine like Playboy with 2.3 million fans, what is the best   approach  to compare engagement on their Facebook page to engagement on   Time’s which has over 2 million fewer members? While there are some    statistical methods can compensate, at the end of the day we believe    it’s going to come down to a qualitative, rather than quantitative   judgment.  In this respect, we present our own views as to the top ten   magazines on Facebook. If you agree / disagree or have a better method please let us know in the comments!</p>
<p><em>Please feel free to share or embed this image on your blog w/ attribution: </em><a href="http://bivin.gs/i93iiJ" target="_blank"><em>Download</em></a><em> at <a title="http://bivin.gs/i93iiJ" href="http://bivin.gs/i93iiJ">http://bivin.gs/i93iiJ</a>.<br />
</em></p>
<p><em>See the speadsheet of our raw data after the jump -<br />
<span id="more-1305"></span></p>
<ol></ol>
<p></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactwatch.com/2011/2011-magazine-facebook-engagement-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Twitter Kill @ThBlackSquirrel Or How Not to Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.impactwatch.com/2011/will-twitter-kill-thblacksquirrel-or-how-not-to-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactwatch.com/2011/will-twitter-kill-thblacksquirrel-or-how-not-to-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Gray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slurp140]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[@ThBlackSquirrel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Squirrel blog post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leavy Black Squirell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter Black Squirell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactwatch.com/2011/will-twitter-kill-thblacksquirrel-or-how-not-to-blog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mixed up in today’s extremely active Twitter stream,&#160; you may have noticed&#160; one topic that seemed out of place, namely that Trendsmap or @TrendsDC was showing a fairly popular dive bar called The Black Squirrel was suddenly a trending topic. Looking into the issue further,&#160; I found that the traffic was being generated after someone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/squirrel_in_suit_fail.jpg"><img style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 0px 8px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="squirrel_in_suit_fail" border="0" alt="squirrel_in_suit_fail" align="right" src="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/squirrel_in_suit_fail_thumb.jpg" width="188" height="203" /></a>Mixed up in today’s extremely active Twitter stream,&#160; you may have noticed&#160; one topic that seemed out of place, namely <a href="http://trendsmap.com/local/us/washington#" target="_blank">that Trendsmap</a> or @TrendsDC was showing a fairly popular dive bar called <a href="http://www.blacksquirreldc.com/279/" target="_blank">The Black Squirrel</a> was suddenly a trending topic. Looking into the issue further,&#160; I found that the traffic was being generated after someone discovered the following post on the restaurant’s blog: <a href="http://www.blacksquirreldc.com/279/" target="_blank">“Spare Us Your Cheap Laughs&quot;</a> which attempts to critique Stephen Colbert’s handling of the Chandra Levy murder trial.     </p>
<p>While we do encourage our clients to create and maintain blogs for their&#160; organizations as a way of reaching out to clientele and discussing topics of mutual interest, those topics should still be related to your organization’s mission and profile. Or if nothing else, always follow rule #1 and “do no harm,” and be especially wary of bringing up divisive topics like politics or religion tends. In short, leave the commentary to the commentators and keep your blog on topic. In this case, The Black Squirrel appears to be swimming far outside their assigned lane <a href="http://www.slurp140.com/thblacksquirrel/" target="_blank">as many on Twitter are outraged</a> over this line which has a particularly divisive opinion about undocumented workers. Commenting on the fact that&#160; the man convicted of murdering Leavy was an illegal immigrant:     </p>
<p><a href="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Spare-Us-Your-Cheap-Laughs-The-Black-Squirrel-Bar_exerpt.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin-left: auto; border-left-width: 0px; margin-right: auto; padding-top: 0px" title="Spare Us Your Cheap Laughs - The Black Squirrel Bar_exerpt" border="0" alt="Spare Us Your Cheap Laughs - The Black Squirrel Bar_exerpt" src="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Spare-Us-Your-Cheap-Laughs-The-Black-Squirrel-Bar_exerpt_thumb.png" width="414" height="162" /></a>     <br />While the author attempts to walk back this generalization about undocumented workers, the last line of the last paragraph does not help:&#160; </p>
<p>“Well-meaning souls on both sides of the political aisle can wax eloquently in favor or against illegal aliens. This is not to take a position on that. That is to suggest that it should not be played to cheap laughs, not <strong>when too many Americans have been vicitimized</strong> [sic] <strong>by it or live in fear of it.”</strong>&#160; Emphasis here is my own.&#160; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/D.C.-Bar-Wants-You-To-Know-It-Hates-Mexicans.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="D.C. Bar Wants You To Know It Hates Mexicans" border="0" alt="D.C. Bar Wants You To Know It Hates Mexicans" align="right" src="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/D.C.-Bar-Wants-You-To-Know-It-Hates-Mexicans_thumb.png" width="240" height="126" /></a>After this first broke on Twitter, it was soon picked up by the very popular Washington D.C. based political satire blog Wonkette, where in a short time it picked up another 847 views, 36 comments and 10 re-tweets. </p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/local-breaking-news/your-take/dc-bar-illegal-immigrants-eat.html" target="_blank">since I started writing this the Washington Post has also picked up on the story!</a>     </p>
<p><a href="http://www.slurp140.com/thblacksquirrel/" target="_blank">Of course, we created a instance of Slurp140 to track the buzz</a>.     </p>
<p><a href="http://www.slurp140.com/thblacksquirrel/"><img style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 0px 7px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="SLURP 140- thblacksquirrel" border="0" alt="SLURP 140- thblacksquirrel" align="right" src="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/SLURP-140-thblacksquirrel.png" width="240" height="134" /></a>Given that I created this 30 minutes ago, we did not capture some older Tweets about the topic, but nevertheless the vast majority of these comments are very much negative in sentiment against the Black Squirrel. So far we have tracked at least 92+ people who say they will not be going back to drink or dine at the Black Squirrel.&#160; </p>
<p>To sum it all up, when thinking of topics for your businesses’ next blog post, do no harm, consider the cost / benefit of swimming outside your lane and of course, check your spelling. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactwatch.com/2011/will-twitter-kill-thblacksquirrel-or-how-not-to-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 Newspaper Facebook Fan Page Study &#8211; Top 10 Results</title>
		<link>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/newspaper-facebook-fan-study-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/newspaper-facebook-fan-study-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bivings Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactwatch.com/?p=1241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Cross posted from the Bivings Report) The Bivings Group has just completed a newspaper online interactivity report looking at Facebook fan engagement amongst the nation’s top 100 newspapers (as determined by circulation). Our main focus was to compare large and small newspapers across the nation by looking at the number of fans that interacted with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>(Cross posted from <a href="http://www.bivingsreport.com/">the Bivings Report</a>)</em><br />
<img src="http://www.bivingsreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/newspaper_info33.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>The Bivings Group has just completed a newspaper online interactivity report looking at Facebook fan engagement amongst the nation’s top 100 newspapers (as determined by circulation). Our main focus was to compare large and small newspapers across the nation by looking at the number of fans that interacted with the newspaper and amongst themselves via posted content via Facebook Fan pages. Over 1,000 individual wall posts were used to determine the averages seen in the above picture.</p>
<p>In addition to ranking each paper by the number of  Facebook fans, we also looked at number of comments per post, and the  variety of post on each page. The overarching intent was to create a  ranking that allowed large regional newspapers to compete on an even  digital playing field with large national papers.</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/#%21/washingtonpost" target="_blank"><strong>The Washington Post</strong></a> – The Post ranks 3rd in number of Facebook fans within the top 100 US  newspapers, but it’s particularly effective form of audience engagement  is what ranks it at the top of our list. It averages 41 likes and 55  comments for every post on it’s fan page wall, and maintains a very high  fan-to-circulation ratio. The Post also features two custom tabs and  its editors periodically use HootSuite to schedule posts and ensure a  consistent stream of information to its readers.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.facebook.com/#%21/chicagotribune" target="_blank">The Chicago Tribune</a></strong> – It may be ranked 9th in the US in terms of circulation, but the  Chicago Tribune has its Facebook engagement down to a science. It boasts  a custom Welcome landing page, a number of newspaper-specific sub  pages,as well as a discussion tab. This is in addition to it’s high  average number of likes and comments on every post, and its continuous  reader questions.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.facebook.com/#%21/azcentral" target="_blank">The Arizona Republic</a> (azcentral.com web portal)</strong> – Due in part to its collaboration with AZcentral.com, the Arizona  republic is ranked 3rd on this list despite having a 40% lower  circulation than the first-ranked Washington Post. Its average number of  likes and comments on posts (as a function of its total number of  Facebook fans) shows that Arizona Republic routinely engaged a larger  number of its fan base.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.facebook.com/#%21/denverpost" target="_blank">The Denver Post</a></strong> – This regional powerhouse newspaper has a greater number of Facebook  fans than the nationally-distributed Los Angeles Times. The average  number of likes and comments on newspaper’s posts are similar to  newspapers with much larger circulations. Likewise, the Denver Post  utilizes custom tabs to post Contests and Classifieds on its fan page.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/mercurynews" target="_blank"><strong>San Jose Mercury News</strong></a> – This newspaper ranks 8th in circulation within the United States, but  we’ve ranked it 5th on this list due to its consistently active  Facebook fans. Often, the fan page will feature simple status updates  (sans links) and will ask the readers questions or just wish them a good  morning. It is this variety in fan communication that earns the Mercury  News a spot in the top 5 of this list.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.facebook.com/#%21/nytimes" target="_blank">The New York Times</a></strong> – This is the nation’s third largest newspaper in terms of circulation, but is <a href="http://www.bivingsreport.com/2010/measuring-newspapers-facebook-engagement-part-1/" target="_blank">by far the most popular news</a> source on Facebook with over one million fans. In fact, their number of  Facebook fans actually exceeds their daily circulation – which is  something no other top 100 US newspaper has accomplished. However, the  number of comments and likes that their posts attain do not show  proportional engagement of their one million fans.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/latimes" target="_blank"><strong>The Los Angeles Times</strong></a> – This west coast paper’s fan base is surpassed in number by much  smaller regional papers such as the Denver Post. However, its fans state  engaged and its numbers of average likes and comments remain fairly  high.  Distinctive feature: their posts are often published using  HootSuite – as opposed to manually sent on Facebook.com.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.facebook.com/clevelandcom" target="_blank">The Cleveland Plain Dealer</a> (Cleveland.com web portal)</strong> – By partnering up with the Cleveland.com web portal, the Plain  Dealer’s Facebook an page become a hub of all things Cleveland-related.   The page also encourages fans to post pictures and otherwise interact  with the Plain Dealer news, sports, and entertainment stories that they  post.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.facebook.com/usatoday" target="_blank">USA Today</a></strong> -   The page boasts an impressive number of Facebook fans and often  asks their fans questions relating to the links that they are posting.  However, with a circulation of over 1.8 million (and being one of the  best recognized national newspapers)– one would think that USA Today can  attain a higher number of fans than 38,000.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/wsjonline" target="_blank"><strong>The Wall Street Journal</strong></a> – This may be the largest US newspaper in terms of circulation (and one of the <a href="http://fora.tv/2009/11/19/Paley_Center_IC2009_-The_Future_of_News_Worldwide#Analyzing_The_Wall_Street_Journals_Paywall_Model_" target="_blank">only ones with a profitable content paywall</a> on the website) , but it’s follower and fan engagement numbers are still <a href="http://www.bivingsreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/newspaper_info33.jpg" target="_blank">only a fraction of those</a> on the NY Times Facebook page. Nonetheless, the page is frequently  updates and fans are able to have lively discussions about each post.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/newspaper-facebook-fan-study-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Social Media Monitoring &amp; Measurement Posts of the Week</title>
		<link>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/top-social-media-monitoring-measurement-posts-of-the-week-60/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/top-social-media-monitoring-measurement-posts-of-the-week-60/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah Del Porto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Monitoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactwatch.com/?p=1194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three Metrics That Make PR Measurement More Meaningful &#8211; The PR Measurement Table How to Select a Social Media Monitoring Service &#8211; The IT Chronicle Listening Is a Skill Well Learned &#8211; ClickZ News The Importance of Monitoring the &#8220;Webiverse&#8221; &#8211; Fast Company Get PR Measurement Off The Island &#8211; Waxing UnLyrical &#8216; SEE LAST [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/4186169983_f637b4a4fd.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1195" style="border: 20px solid white;" title="4186169983_f637b4a4fd" src="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/4186169983_f637b4a4fd.jpg" alt="" width="265" height="300" /></a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dld.bz/vZxP" target="_blank">Three Metrics That Make PR Measurement More Meaningful</a> &#8211; The PR Measurement Table</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dld.bz/vZg2" target="_blank">How to Select a Social Media Monitoring Service</a> &#8211; The IT Chronicle</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dld.bz/vKnw" target="_blank">Listening Is a Skill Well Learned</a> &#8211; ClickZ News</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dld.bz/vR8K" target="_blank">The Importance of Monitoring the &#8220;Webiverse&#8221;</a> &#8211; Fast Company</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dld.bz/vCjz" target="_blank">Get PR Measurement Off The Island</a> &#8211; Waxing UnLyrical</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8216;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/top-social-media-monitoring-measurement-posts-of-the-week-59/" target="_blank">SEE LAST WEEK´S TOP POSTS</a></p>
<p>-</p>
<p>photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/x-ray_delta_one/" target="_blank">x-ray delta one</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/top-social-media-monitoring-measurement-posts-of-the-week-60/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Social Media Monitoring &amp; Measurement Posts of the Week</title>
		<link>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/top-social-media-monitoring-measurement-posts-of-the-week-59/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/top-social-media-monitoring-measurement-posts-of-the-week-59/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah Del Porto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactwatch.com/?p=1172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few goodies for the week: Social Media Metrics Beyond Small Victories &#8211; Engage Online Media Monitoring: An Essential Part of Listening &#8211; Burrelles Luce Try Being Unsocial with Customers First &#8211; Destination CRM - SEE LAST WEEK&#8217;S TOP POSTS - photo: soulfish]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/balloons.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1173" style="border: 20px solid white;" title="balloons" src="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/balloons.jpg" alt="" width="223" height="248" /></a>A few goodies for the week:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dld.bz/vjtT" target="_blank">Social Media Metrics Beyond Small Victories</a> &#8211; Engage</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dld.bz/u9xy" target="_blank">Online Media Monitoring: An Essential Part of Listening</a> &#8211; Burrelles Luce</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dld.bz/uMWn" target="_blank">Try Being Unsocial with Customers First</a> &#8211; Destination CRM</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://dld.bz/vjtT"></a><br />
-<br />
<strong><a href="http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/top-social-media-monitoring-measurement-posts-of-the-week-58/" target="_blank">SEE LAST WEEK&#8217;S TOP POSTS</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>-</strong></p>
<p>photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/soulfish/" target="_blank">soulfish</a><strong><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/top-social-media-monitoring-measurement-posts-of-the-week-59/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Social Media Monitoring &amp; Measurement Posts of the Week</title>
		<link>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/top-social-media-monitoring-measurement-posts-of-the-week-58/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/top-social-media-monitoring-measurement-posts-of-the-week-58/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah Del Porto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactwatch.com/?p=1163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With everyone on vacation this month, there hasn&#8217;t been a lot to read. Here&#8217;s the best of August: 10 Steps for Successful Social Media Monitoring &#8211; Mashable Social Media ROI – is this the measurement framework we’ve been waiting for? &#8211; Smart Insights The 10/90 Rule for Social Media &#8211; Sysomos Ethics in PR Measurement [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/1583538_0f1b48a241.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1164 alignright" style="border: 20px solid white;" title="1583538_0f1b48a241" src="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/1583538_0f1b48a241.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="240" /></a>With everyone on vacation this month, there hasn&#8217;t been a lot to read. Here&#8217;s the best of August:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dld.bz/pQrp" target="_blank">10 Steps for Successful Social Media Monitoring</a> &#8211; Mashable</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dld.bz/qcf9 " target="_blank">Social Media ROI – is this the measurement framework we’ve been waiting for?</a> &#8211; Smart Insights</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dld.bz/rqub" target="_blank">The 10/90 Rule for Social Media</a> &#8211; Sysomos</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dld.bz/suGe " target="_blank">Ethics in PR Measurement</a> &#8211; Philip Sheldrake</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dld.bz/ta3b " target="_blank">The etiquette of eavesdropping</a> &#8211; Research Magazine</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dld.bz/tkvW " target="_blank">Rethinking the Value of Social Media: Measurement</a> &#8211; WebWorkerDaily</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dld.bz/tqKs " target="_blank">From WTF To KPI: PR Measurement In Acronyms</a> &#8211; Shonali Burke</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dld.bz/txVQ " target="_blank">Choosing Goals for Social Media</a> &#8211; Amber Naslund</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://dld.bz/tPnD " target="_blank">Customized Social Media Metrics Are Important to Measurement</a> &#8211; Spiral16</li>
</ul>
<p>-</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/top-social-media-monitoring-measurement-posts-of-the-week-57/" target="_self">See Last Week&#8217;s Top Posts</a></strong></p>
<p>-</p>
<p>photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/r80o/" target="_blank">Mark Strozier</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/top-social-media-monitoring-measurement-posts-of-the-week-58/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media Monitoring: 5 Ways to Know if You&#8217;re Doing It Right</title>
		<link>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/social-media-monitoring-5-ways-to-know-if-youre-doing-it-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/social-media-monitoring-5-ways-to-know-if-youre-doing-it-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah Del Porto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Monitoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactwatch.com/?p=1149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. You don&#8217;t feel like a sitting duck. One of the giant benefits of social media is the opportunity to get &#8220;out there&#8221;, you know, &#8220;with the people.&#8221; Social media coverage is an invaluable source of sentiment data so you can track consumer feelings about your product and head off any problems before they snowball. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/3624435520_65c3e8c686.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1152" title="3624435520_65c3e8c686" src="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/3624435520_65c3e8c686.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a>1. You don&#8217;t feel like a sitting duck.</strong></p>
<p>One of the giant benefits of social media is the opportunity to get &#8220;out there&#8221;, you know, &#8220;with the people.&#8221; Social media coverage is an invaluable source of sentiment data so you can track consumer feelings about your product and head off any problems before they snowball. Social media monitoring means that you don&#8217;t have to wait until sales are affected to find out about changes in your market.</p>
<p><strong>2. You know what you&#8217;re doing.</strong></p>
<p>With solid media metrics, you will have a foundation for your marketing ideas. You can figure out what is working with your audience and do more of that. Archiving and monitoring over time provide trend data that shows where your efforts have been and helps you figure out where they should be going. If you just monitor sporadically for your one-day &#8220;push,&#8221; you won&#8217;t have a baseline to compare your initiative to and you&#8217;ll miss all the good stuff the market is trying to tell you even when you&#8217;re not bombarding it with messages.</p>
<p><strong>3. You know what your competitors are doing.</strong></p>
<p>With social media, it&#8217;s all out there. You can monitor your industry and competitor coverage just like you monitor your own brand. Is your competitor hiring 10 programmers all of a sudden? They&#8217;re up to something. Are dozens of tweeters complaining about your partner company&#8217;s customer service? Might be time to cut that cord. Your brand name isn&#8217;t the only one that affects your bottom line.</p>
<p><strong>4. You&#8217;re not chasing back coverage.</strong></p>
<p>Part of successful media monitoring is anticipating how people will talk about you. Let&#8217;s say I&#8217;m monitoring my social media coverage and I&#8217;m tracking &#8220;Hannah Del Porto&#8221; and &#8220;@handels.&#8221; Bases covered, right? Well, right up until Ben &amp; Jerry&#8217;s releases a delicious flavor, aptly named &#8220;Hannah Banana,&#8221; in my honor.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t just sit back and assume that anyone who talks about my flavor will also mention my full name or twitter handle. I have to be watching for developments related to my brand (a lot of these are internal, guys, so it&#8217;s not really a challenge) and change my keywords so the coverage comes to me instead of having to chase it down after the fact. This means I&#8217;m ready with immediate metrics and the ability to produce a report for that last minute meeting (likely about why the hell I have an ice cream named after me).</p>
<p><strong>5. Your monitoring program is not an island.</strong></p>
<p>A good media program costs money. You either paid for some kind of fancy software or you have an army of analysts locked in the basement wading through your media mentions. Either way, to get the most out of your investment, you have to integrate the results with your business activities. Customer service complaint via Twitter? Let your account managers in on it. Blog about 10 improvements that should be made in your industry? Forward it to product development. If you only have your PR/comm people seeing this information, you are missing out on a lot of your monitoring program&#8217;s value.</p>
<p><em><strong>How do you know if your monitoring program is a success? Are you wringing out every drop of valuable information?</p>
<p></strong></em>photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/visual_dichotomy/" target="_blank">visual.dichotomy</a><em><strong></strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/social-media-monitoring-5-ways-to-know-if-youre-doing-it-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s Get Real-Time. Live Twitter Streams in ImpactWatch.</title>
		<link>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/lets-get-real-time-live-twitter-streams-in-impactwatch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/lets-get-real-time-live-twitter-streams-in-impactwatch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Fitzpatrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ImpactWatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ImpactWatch Demo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ImpactWatch Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Feeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media for Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactwatch.com/?p=1139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ImpactWatch now displays a real-time feed of custom filtered tweets right on your dashboard. Based on Slurp140 technology, the new Twitter stream updates automatically to display new tweets, a leaderboard of most frequent tweeters, and stats on your tweets over time. Best of all, you can instantly reply to or retweet any mention right from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ImpactWatch now displays a real-time feed of custom filtered tweets right on your dashboard.</p>
<p>Based on <a href="http://www.bivingsreport.com/2009/the-bivings-group-releases-twitterslurp-to-open-source-community/" target="_blank">Slurp140</a> technology, the new Twitter stream updates automatically to display new tweets, a leaderboard of most frequent tweeters, and stats on your tweets over time.</p>
<p>Best of all, you can instantly reply to or retweet any mention right from your tweet stream!</p>
<p>The new Twitter tool complements ImpactWatch&#8217;s existing range of feed sources which includes print, online or broadcast news, and social media sources. Depending on your monitoring and measurement needs we can customize your platform with the sources that are important to you.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/stream.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1140" title="stream" src="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/stream-300x267.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="267" /></a></p>
<p>Graphs and statistics also update in real-time on the Dashboard page, so you can see the who, when and what of your Twitter coverage.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/dashboard.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1141" title="dashboard" src="http://www.impactwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/dashboard-300x267.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="267" /></a><br />
We have a lot of features on the way in the coming weeks, so keep an eye out for more. Sign up for a <a href="http://www.impactwatch.com/" target="_blank">Demo Account</a> now to check it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.impactwatch.com/2010/lets-get-real-time-live-twitter-streams-in-impactwatch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

